<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Microsoft on Neil Grogan</title><link>/tags/microsoft/</link><description>Recent content in Microsoft on Neil Grogan</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.135.0</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>2004-present Neil Grogan</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/tags/microsoft/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Chrome vs. Internet Explorer Audience</title><link>/chrome-vs-internet-explorer-audience/</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/chrome-vs-internet-explorer-audience/</guid><description>&lt;p>Lately both Google and Microsoft have been advertising their respective browsers
on British Television (received in Ireland by the vast majority of the
population). It&amp;rsquo;s interesting the different approach each company is taking.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Chrome ad:&lt;/p>
&lt;iframe allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/E0qDrRJT4zE" width="560">&lt;/iframe>
&lt;p>To me the Chrome ad is very family oriented, stressing the utility of the web
and the ease of reaching people and staying in touch. No surprise they
didn&amp;rsquo;t feature Facebook, which is what the vast majority use to keep in
touch.&lt;br />&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Microsoft settles with Eolas over Internet Explorer</title><link>/microsoft-settles-with-eolas-over/</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/microsoft-settles-with-eolas-over/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.cbi.cnptia.embrapa.br/xmeeting/include/img/microsoft-logo.jpg">&lt;img loading="lazy" src="http://www.cbi.cnptia.embrapa.br/xmeeting/include/img/microsoft-logo.jpg" alt="image" />
&lt;/a>&lt;br>
&lt;a href="http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/news.nv?storyid=single9119">Microsoft has settled with Eolas&lt;/a>
over a number of patents regarding browser plugins which chicago based Eolas
filed patents for in 1998. A jury in Chicago then found Microsoft guilty of
infringing on Eolas’ patents and was told to pay $521m US Dollars in &amp;lsquo;damages&amp;rsquo;.
That ruling was overturned and a fresh trial ordered which was due to start very
soon, but it seems Microsoft has decided to pay out:&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Dell refunds me for Windows!</title><link>/dell-refunds-me-for-windows/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/dell-refunds-me-for-windows/</guid><description>&lt;p>As many of you know I am a &lt;a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/">Linux&lt;/a> and
&lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/mac">Mac&lt;/a>
&lt;a href="http://www.google.ie/search?q=define:aficionado&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;=t&amp;amp;=com.ubuntu:en-US:official&amp;amp;=firefox-a">aficionado&lt;/a>.
For my Linux machines, all of them are &lt;a href="http://www.dell.com/open">Dell&lt;/a>. I have
been always pleased with Dells prices, how their machines work with Linux, their
customer service and the fact they are made in Limerick, Ireland (I am from
Ireland). I politely emailed Dell (well got up on my high horse), heres my first
mail:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>I would like a refund of Windows XP since I am installing Ubuntu Linux on the
computer when I get it. When I turn on the computer I am going to decline the
EULA, and I am within my rights to request this refund (as part of Irish
consumer laws). This also applies in Britian, see here: (
&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6144782.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6144782.stm&lt;/a>
)&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Seven financial reasons not to use Windows</title><link>/seven-financial-reasons-not-to-use/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/seven-financial-reasons-not-to-use/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://img516.imageshack.us/my.php?image=windowslogo2oy4.jpg">&lt;img loading="lazy" src="http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/8713/windowslogo2oy4.jpg" alt="image" />
&lt;/a>&lt;br>
I
recently read a very insightful article on 7 factors every company should
seriously consider about Microsoft Windows, here they are summarised:&lt;/p>
&lt;ol>
&lt;li>
&lt;p>Licensing Costs&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Everyone in the IT industry today knows that proprietary operating systems
and the applications that run on them will cost you a lot of money on
licensing fees. According to a recent Forrester study, U.S. companies
overall are expected to spend $100 billion on software maintenance in 2007.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Bill Gates lists Vista 'innovations'</title><link>/bill-gates-lists-vista/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/bill-gates-lists-vista/</guid><description>&lt;p>Hard to believe really, Mr.Gates lists Windows Vista &amp;lsquo;innovations&amp;rsquo;. Now Apple
has been shipping everything he mentions since 2005, and I have tried Vista, it
doesn&amp;rsquo;t even surpass Apples&amp;rsquo; attempt at the software (which should be his aim).
Some things have been around for years, but it&amp;rsquo;s how well your software can do
it is the key. Personally I wouldn&amp;rsquo;t tout features that another competitor does
better, but thats just me. It seems irresponsible and unbelieveable the head of
a public company can say and get away with this - not knowing the competition
that is. I wouldn&amp;rsquo;t trust my money to anyone who does not keep up with the
latest and greatest trends in the industry.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Get the facts, about "Get the Facts"</title><link>/get-facts-about-get-facts/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/get-facts-about-get-facts/</guid><description>&lt;p>Just a quick blurb about some things Microsoft like to say: Don&amp;rsquo;t believe it,
well at least not it all anyway. On the
&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/ireland/getthefacts/default.mspx" title="Irish Get the Facts">Irish &amp;ldquo;Get the Facts&amp;rdquo; page&lt;/a>
(on Windows Server vs. Linux), they make critical errors of judgement a person
reasonably well versed in computing could deconstruct. First of all, Linux isn&amp;rsquo;t
a server, its a kernel, like the Windows kernel. So comparing &amp;ldquo;Windows Server
2003&amp;rdquo; to &amp;ldquo;Linux&amp;rdquo; is misleading to say the least, and stupid to say the most. You
could run any server software on Linux you wished, even Windows Server 2003 if
Microsoft ported it! For the sake of argument, I think they are comparing
themselves to Apache, which runs 60% of worldwide
servers&lt;a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2007/01/05/january_2007_web_server_survey.html" title="Netcraft Server Marketshare">[1]&lt;/a>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Internet Explorer thanks Firefox, sincerely?</title><link>/internet-explorer-thanks-firefox/</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/internet-explorer-thanks-firefox/</guid><description>&lt;p>Reading my favourite tech news site: Slashdot ( &lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/06/10/26/1238239.shtml">/.&lt;/a>), I see the &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/">Internet
Explorer team&lt;/a> have sent the &lt;a href="http://getfirefox.com/">Firefox Team&lt;/a> a nice cake:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;img loading="lazy" src="http://static.flickr.com/118/278562314_14716c0232.jpg" alt="MS IE Cake for Firefox
2" />
&lt;/p>
&lt;p>One comment I read said it all really:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>Seems even the IE team knows that IE is dead.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>As for the ex-lax, bugs, pubes in the cake of course none of that is true.
Those things would only be possible if someone at Microsoft actually made the
cake, and that&amp;rsquo;s not how MS does things. They knew they couldn&amp;rsquo;t make a good
cake so they just went out and bought a cake from someone who already knew how
to make one and then stuck their logo on it and called it theirs.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>